Bring a deal. O builds the appraisal and cashflow model and the formal proposal, writes the teaser, drafts the credit paper a funder would write, then researches our database of 1,900+ funders and buyers and goes deeper with Claude. For oil and gas, renewables, data centres and real estate.
Co-designed by Grok and Claude, managed by Claude, and peer reviewed every step of the way by ChatGPT and Gemini.
Originatus does not charge a success fee.
Upload the documents you already have and O will read them and input the data for you, or enter the numbers yourself. A few minutes is enough, even for integrated solar and BESS, multi asset portfolios or stranded gas.
O builds the appraisal, checks it against lender tests, writes the one page teaser (a prospect PDF) and the full proposal, drafts the credit paper, scores the deal, and researches who might fund or buy it. Working interest deals are covered too, with research on likely buyers and partners.
You pick the funders and buyers and make the introduction yourself. O does not approach funders directly, but we host your data room for you to invite funders to view.
O writes a clean, institutional style one page teaser from the numbers and documents you supply. Ready to send. From oil and gas NAPE style prospect PDFs to an infrastructure, energy or real estate equity fund pitch.
O builds the financial appraisal and cashflow forecast, including integrated solar and BESS, multi phase developments and other complex structures, then writes the proposal around them. One document, ready to send.
O checks every appraisal against the tests a lender actually applies, such as debt cover, loan to value, loan to cost, DSCR, leases, permits, offtake and interconnection. You get a plain verdict and the specific changes that would move it. Problems are flagged early, while you can still fix them. Nothing is blocked.
O scores the deal and shows the concrete changes that would improve the chance of funding, a sale, or a working interest deal. You also get practical suggestions for missing information, elements that need clarification, and ways to reduce a lender’s perception of risk.
O then goes one step further. O drafts the credit paper a funder’s own team might write about your proposal. For your eyes only. You see the questions, the risks and the improvement levers before you ever send it.
O researches its own database of 1,900+ funders, family offices (corporate only), specialist lenders and buyers against their stated mandates. It shows those whose stated mandate covers your deal and which have backed similar transactions.
Claude then searches well beyond the database for additional funders, working interest players and buyers that are not yet listed. It reads what each has done and said, and reports back with sources.
You decide who to approach. O prepares a pack with the key people at each counterparty and how to reach them. You make the contact.
O runs the NDA and NCNDA process so documents only move once the paperwork is in place.
Each asset or deal has its own data room. Only you control access. It is not public. It holds the documents O has prepared plus planning and zoning, reserve reports, valuations, feasibility studies, offtake agreements and interconnection evidence. You choose what goes in.
Group several smaller assets into one institutional package. O builds the combined appraisal, cashflow and teaser automatically, so a collection of sub scale deals becomes something a funder will actually look at.
A deal that looks right on paper often fails at the first lender question. O runs a rule based check across oil and gas, renewables, data centres and real estate, using the numbers you entered. It reports one of three results: Looks viable on these inputs, Needs work, or Does not work as structured. Each point comes with what it means and how big a change would fix it, such as how much less debt, or what rent.
Each rule is tested against known cases before it is shown to you.
O never changes your inputs. You decide what to change.
The check reads your inputs. It is not a recommendation to fund or invest.
If the check shows a deal does not work, you can revise it yourself or ask for a quote to have the structure reworked for you. The work is a fixed fee agreed up front. There is no success fee, and no obligation to proceed.
Tests whether gas that cannot reach a pipeline can power a compute site.
Compares power from your own gas with diesel or other site power.
A desk based view of lithium brine potential.
Walks you through whether a critical minerals project is worth taking further.
A fast first look at a US solar, wind, battery or solar and battery project. It shows whether it is worth taking further and what you would need to believe for it to work.
The same quick first look for UK projects, built around UK grid, planning and revenue assumptions.
Appraises a charging hub with its grid cost, utilisation and solar self use, and shows the credit view a funder would take.
The Land Use Potential Screen tests a site for data centre use alongside other uses, covering power, planning or zoning and the main constraints, and flags where the gaps are.
Reviews the key characteristics of a piece of land and explores every real estate and renewable use that could apply. It tells you which to discount and which may be viable.
Jointly designed by Grok and Claude. Built and managed by Claude. Peer reviewed all the way by GPT and Gemini.
Work one deal properly for three months with a Single Deal pass at £300, or choose a plan. Flat pricing and no success fees.
See plans